Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ''Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications''; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.
Summary
H.Res. 282 is a procedural resolution that the House has passed to establish the rules for considering four separate legislative measures. This type of resolution does not itself become law but rather sets the framework for how the House will debate and vote on other bills and resolutions.
The resolution would allow the House to consider two joint resolutions that disapprove of rules issued by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. One targets a rule about overdraft lending practices at very large financial institutions, while the other addresses rules defining larger participants in digital consumer payment applications. These disapproval resolutions, if passed, would reject the consumer protection agency's regulatory actions.
The resolution would also establish debate rules for two additional bills. H.R. 1526 would limit the authority of federal district courts to issue injunctive relief, which could affect the ability of courts to stop government actions or enforce rights through court orders. H.R. 22 would require proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote in federal elections, modifying current voter registration procedures.
Since this resolution has passed the House, it now moves to the Senate for consideration. If the Senate approves it, the procedural rules would be set, allowing the House to proceed with debating and voting on these four separate measures. The actual impact on citizens would depend on whether these underlying bills and resolutions are subsequently passed into law.
AI-generated summary
Lifecycle of the Bill
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-49, by Mr. Griffith.
Apr 1, 2025
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-49, by Mr. Griffith.
Apr 1, 2025
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-49, by Mr. Griffith.
Apr 1, 2025
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-49, by Mr. Griffith.
Apr 1, 2025